What leadership can act on
Decide which paths are material, which are theoretical, what evidence is missing, and what must change.
Product
AI Threat Model
Prioritize the attack, misuse, and failure paths that could cause real harm.
What you receive
The attack, misuse, and failure paths that matter.
Connects credible AI-specific and conventional system scenarios to the actual architecture, actor capability, evidence maturity, business impact, current controls, response options, and owners.
Created through
Created through AI Security & Threat Modeling and updated through an agreed change review.
What it contains
- Prompt injection, data poisoning, model and tool misuse, excessive agency, identity abuse, tenant crossing, sensitive-data exposure, supply-chain compromise, denial and cost attacks, unsafe automation, and recovery failure.
- Threat actors, preconditions, affected assets, paths, feasibility or maturity, evidence, controls, consequence, detection and mitigation needs, owners, and residual risk.
Format and use
A versioned threat model directing mitigation, design, validation, monitoring, recovery, and explicit risk decisions.
The model reflects the agreed system, actor assumptions, and evidence window and does not claim every scenario is known.